Technology Comparison:
|
Comparative Point |
Hans BioShaft |
Conventional
|
Membrane
Bio-Reactor |
|
Process |
Attach growth process |
Activated
sludge |
Separation process |
|
Capital Investment |
Competitive |
Standard |
Not competitive |
|
Cost & Efficiency |
Low
(very simple with |
High |
Very high |
|
Required
Area for |
Less
than others (less |
Large |
Large |
|
Sludge Treatment |
Minimal Required |
Required |
Required |
|
Energy Consumption |
Low
(only air pumps), |
High
(air pumps and |
Very
high (air pumps and large number of mechanical motors required) - up to
0.026 KW-hr/gal |
|
Maintenance
& |
Maintenance
free self |
Maintenance
needed - |
Intensive
maintenance and |
|
Replacement of Major Items |
No replacement |
Replacement
of |
Membrane replacement periodically |
|
Possibility of Expansion |
Unlimited |
Limited |
Limited |
|
Operating Cost |
Low
(air compressor only, no electromechanical |
High (air pumps and large number of mechanical motors required, large number of personnel required) |
High (air pumps and large number of mechanical motors required, large number of personnel required) |
|
Maintenance |
Very low (no mechanical equipment only standard compressor) |
High |
High |
|
Construction |
Above and underground |
Above
ground and |
Some of them can be erected under ground (with limit capacity) |
|
Relocation
of the |
Possible |
Not possible |
Not possible |
|
Population Limit |
No limits |
No limits |
No limits |
|
Landscape Disturbance |
Low |
High |
High |
|
Odor |
Negligible |
Present |
Low |
|
Water
Effluent Quality |
Tertiary
10/10ppm |
Secondary
- requires |
High quality 5/5 ppm (5/5 mg/l) |